Skip to content
JevDirectory.org
CommunityPractices & PatternsPostVerified 2026-09-22

Security decisions that fit Jev

An argument that security work is full of bounded engineering decisions that belong to Jev rather than a chat model, with examples of the calls that fit.

Category
Practices & Patterns
Published by
Community
Author
Kostastsale
Added
2026-09-22

The post

This made me rethink where AI actually fits into security engineering. For purely engineering work, forget about ChatGPT or Claude. TypeSafe AI just released Jev, and I think it’s going to change how we build AI into security workflows. Instead of asking an LLM to “investigate Show more

TypeSafe AI
TypeSafe AI
@typesafeai

we are officially out of stealth! join the frontier and get access to Jev on our website (link on profile)

Reply
Tagscommunityxsecurity

Highlights

  • Argues security work contains many bounded decisions that fit Jev.
  • Lists examples where a typed answer beats a paragraph of prose.
  • Draws the line at open-ended investigation, which stays with LLMs.

Watch out

An opinion thread from a practitioner, not a measured comparison.

More like this

A public benchmark comparing Jev with Claude Haiku 4.5 on whether an email agent should click a link, over 2,000 PhishNChips emails, with calibration, latency, cost, and five signal questions.
Practices & Patterns#community#python#security
2GitHub stars
Blind security benchmarks for Jev on public corpora: 662 prompt-injection messages and 200 matched vulnerable-code pairs, with raw per-sample results and a TUI dashboard.
Practices & Patterns#community#go#benchmarks
Communityjev-sec-bench
A measurement harness that sends each file snippet to Jev as one Noul question asking whether the content contains a usable secret credential, then scores the returned probability against the expected label.
Practices & Patterns#community#python#security
Back to all resources

From the community

Posts from builders shipping with Jev right now.

Follow @typesafeai

Security decisions that fit Jev

This made me rethink where AI actually fits into security engineering. For purely engineering work, forget about ChatGPT or Claude. TypeSafe AI just released Jev, and I think it’s going to change how we build AI into security workflows. Instead of asking an LLM to “investigate Show more

TypeSafe AI
TypeSafe AI
@typesafeai

we are officially out of stealth! join the frontier and get access to Jev on our website (link on profile)

Reply

A million judged questions

Inferring Jev's internals from 1,000 calls

Jevの内部アーキテクチャを推測している技術記事(Jev’s Architecture Unmasked)からメモ。 ・本記事はJevのAPIを約1万回の呼び出して、内部構造を推測したもの ・従来の言語モデルを用いた分類やルーティングでは、トークンを1文字ずつ逐次生成するために膨大な無駄な計算コストが発生していた。 Show more

Reply

The open System One roundup

Jev 发布没几天,开源社区已经开始疯狂复刻了🔥 最值得推荐的五个模型: 1、Laya 421M:原生决策模型,支持 Mac 2、Decider-2B:最像 Jev,基于 Qwen3.5 3、NanoJev 0.6B:专门的 Decision Head 4、Reflex:Qwen3.5 + Direct Logits 5、System-One 4B:专门做概率校准 Show more

小墨同学
小墨同学
@xiaomovps

Jev 刚发布没几天,开源社区就出现了同款🔥 Decider-2B模型,是基于 Qwen3.5-2B 做了特殊调整 它和 Jev 模型是一样的 只做选择 评分和判断 不是文本类的 LLM 模型 但两者还是有几个明显区别: 1、模型 Jev:闭源 System One Model Decider:Qwen3.5-2B,约 1.9B 参数,Apache 2.0 开源 2、价格

Image
Reply

The launch post

Trading bot, one decision per block